Seminar in Other Religions

MSSN82

Table of Contents

  1. Overview of Course
  2. Goal of this Course
  3. Course requirements

Overview of Course

One hundred and forty years ago, in 1860, the first really representative missionary conference in modern times was held in Liverpool.  Full records were kept, and reading the lectures and the discussions today, one is almost in the position of a listener at those proceedings of long ago.  Much of what passed strikes a curiously modern note.  The vocabulary has changed—we no longer speak of native Churches—but many of the concerns are exactly the same as those discussed at the most recent meetings in mission conferences.  There is, however, one notable difference.  Hardly a word was said about the non-Christian religions with which the missionaries have to do in their daily practical work; we could hardly imagine such a neglect in the proceedings of a missionary conference today.

 

A good many reasons could be given for the apparent indifference.  Those present at the Conference were concerned primarily with their own problems as preachers of the Gospel in strange lands (only one representative of a young Church, an Indian clergyman, was present at the Conference of 1860), and with the developments in the Churches that were growing up under their guidance.  Many of them were dealing with primitive peoples whose religious ideas may not have seemed to them very important.  But perhaps the main reason was that, even in 1860, the great religions of the East were still imperfectly known.  Max Müller’s great series of The Sacred Books of the East still lay in the future—the first volume was published only in 1875.  (A great deal of pioneer work, particularly in the study of the classical languages of the East, had, or course, been accomplished before 1860.)

 

The situation we face today is as difference as could well be imagined.  All the religions of the world have been minutely studied, some of the best work having been produced where Western science has cooperated with the institutions and inner apprehensions of the Eastern mind.  All the great works have been translated into all the main languages of Europe.  Selections have appeared in paperback form and are easily available.  More than we perhaps realize, something of the Eastern mind, and particular of Indian thought has become part of the unconscious furniture of our minds.

 

The whole study started with comparative philology, the study and classification of languages, followed what is often called “comparative religion” but should have been more correctly been called “the comparative study of religions.”  One of the first tasks was to classify religions according to the main recognizable types, such as the prophetic and mystical types of religions.   Those who engaged in such comparative studies included Christianity as one of the phenomena to be studied, classified and compared.  For example, Salomon Reinach in his Orpheus (1909), ended his work with a combined study of Judaism and Christianity, which he regarded as only slightly variant forms of one of the principle types of religion.

 

Christian reactions to this approach were on the whole favorable.  Ideas of evolution were in the air, and had been transplanted without due thought from the sphere of biology to many other aspects of human life.  It chimed well with new ideas of tolerance to think of Christianity as playing its part in man’s age-long search for God.  Christianity would naturally hold that it was the highest manifestation of the divine that had yet been accorded to the human race, but need not necessarily exclude the thought that it might be a resting place on the endless pilgrimage of man rather than his permanent home.

 

It was at this stage of the argument that Hendrik Kraemer launched his first great book, The Christian Message in a non-Christian World, written in preparation for the International Missionary Conference held at Tambaram in 1938.  Here he took up a position as different as possible from that of all the supporters of the comparative method.  Speaking of the Gospel in terms of “biblical realism.” He argued that this story of the divine action in Christ is of its nature entirely different from anything to be found in any other religion.  The comparative method had taken it for granted that all religions are equal—the possibility of comparison between them is self-evident.  It was precisely this claim that Kraemer denied.  The Gospel is in fact incommensurable with everything else; to attempt to bring it into such comparison with other faiths is at once to falsify it.

                                   

                                    Adapted from   Stephen Neil,

Christian Faith and Other Faiths.  The Christian Dialogue with other Religions, 1970, pp. 1ff

Back to Top

Goal of this course

The goal of this course is that of a dialogue.  The aim is to enter “into the heart and spirit of another religion,” yet without disloyalty to one’s own; to seek what is positive in other faiths, and the questions they may rightly ask of Christianity, as well as the pertinent questions about God and man, which Christians may put to them.

Back to Top

Course Requirements

 

1.                  Class Attendance and Format

 

Since this class is offered as a doctoral seminar, regular class attendance is required.  Class meets every Monday, 3:30-6:20pm in the James White Library, Room 279.

 

During most of the classes students are required to make presentations and report on research projects assigned during this class.

 

 

2.                  Reading

 

A fair amount of knowledge regarding the major world religions is expected for students taking this class.  Such knowledge should have been gained by taking a class on the MDiv level, such as MSSN670 Christianity and Other Religions. 

 

Recommended Reading--

 

Students who have not had any formal classes in world religions are recommended to read the following introductory books:

 

Roger Eastman (ed.), 1999.  The Ways of Religion.  An Introduction to the Major Traditions.  New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

 

Jacob Neusner (ed),  2000.  World Religions in America. An Introduction.  Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press. 

 

David             Levinson, 1996.  Religion. A Cross-Cultural Dictionary.  New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

 

Required Reading--

 

Hans Küng et al., 1993.  Christianity and World Religions. Paths to Dialogue.  Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

 

Ian S.  Markham (ed.).  2000.  A World Religions Reader.  Second Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.

 

Daniel B. Clendenin. 1995.  Many Gods, Many Lords. Christianity Encounters World Religions. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

 

Additional short articles will be assigned during the semester.

 

3.                  Class Presentations

 

a.         Students will have to be prepared for class discussions on the following books:

 

(1)        Daniel B. Clendenin. 1995.  Many Gods, Many Lords. Christianity Encounters World Religions.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

 

(2)        Hans Küng et al., 1993.  Christianity and World Religions. Paths to Dialogue.  Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.

 

b.         Students will also make short presentations on a religion not discussed in Hans Küng’s book.  The 30-minute presentation should be based in part in the reading of Ian S.  Markham’s book (the book provides an excellent annotated bibliography for additional information)

           

c.                   A one-hour presentation on a major research project.  Such as:

 

(1)               Religion and Human Nature

 

Based in Keith Ward’s Book, Religion and Human Nature.  Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.

 

(2)               Religion and Community

 

Based in Keith Ward’s Book, Religion and Community.  Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 2000.

 

(3)               Religion and Revelation

 

Based in Keith Ward’s Book, Religion and Revelation.  Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994.

 

(4)               Or another relevant topic to the class

 

 

4.                  Written Assignments

 

a.         A critical review of Hans Küng’s book (5-6 pp.).  For guidelines of such a review, see ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE OF A CRITICAL BOOK REVIEW (in Attachment).

 

b.                  An outline of presentation of a religion as discussed in item 3/b above (5-6 pp.).

 

c.                   A major comparative research paper on religious issue as discussed in 3/c above (of at least 25 pages).

 

 

5.         Time Table

 

This seminar is scheduled to meet every Monday (3:30-6:20pm) in the James White Library, Room 279

 

September

 4         (Labor Day Holiday)

            11        Kűng  :  A/1     Cristian

            18        Kűng  :  A/2     Paul;                 A/3      Leon

            25        Kűng  :  A/4     Cristian B/1       Leon

 

October

              2        Kűng  :  B/2      Paul                  B/3       Cristian         B/4      Leon

              9        (Columbus Day Holiday)

            16        Kűng  :  C/1     Paul                  C/2      Leon              C/3      Cristian

23        Kűng  :  C/4     Paul

            30        Clendenin, Ch. 1,2        Cristian

                                          Ch. 2,4       Leon

                                          Ch. 5,6       Paul

November

              6

            13

20        (Seminary Colloquium, No Classes)

27

 

December

4                  Religion and Human Nature (Paul);

Religion and Community  (Cristian)

            11        Religion and Revelation (Leon)

            18        (Exam week)

 

During the month of November students meet individually with instructor discussing progress and preparation of final paper  (a minimum of 2-3 hours).  Otherwise no classes.  Time should be used in the preparation of research paper

 

On Dec 18 class will meet for a summary of discussion.

Back to Top

Rudi Maier
Copyright © 2000  Andrews University. All rights reserved.
Revised: November 23, 2000 .