INTRODUCTION
These are the major topics that we will look at in
Chapter 14:
- Summative Evaluations
- The Process of Summative Evaluations.
- Problems with Summative Evaluations of Teachers
Summative evaluation according to Sergiovanni and Starrat
(1998, p. 297) is the kind of evaluation which involves coming to a conclusion
or making a judgement about the quality of the teacher's performance. This kind
of evaluation, "rates the teacher's performance as meeting, exceeding or
falling below some standard of teaching competence or some level of acceptable
teaching performance."
A summative evaluation is often tied to deciding whether or
not to grant a teacher tenure, whether to promote a teacher to a higher rank or
whether to renew a tenured teacher's contract. Here are some distinctions
between Formative and Summative evaluations
How are teachers evaluated? Do all teachers receive
evaluations? Are evaluations of beginning teachers and tenured teachers the
same? This
Iowa
system has a lot of answers to these basic questions. Read through this
entire site for some of the latest in theory and practice.
- Monte Vista Elementary Schoolhttp://www.vusd.k12.ca.us/mv/sarc/sarc99.html
- Teacher Evaluation
http://sisnet.ssku.k12.ca.us/users/yhsftp/public_html/wasc/profile.htm
- Lafayette School Corporation, C 780 Evaluation of
Administrators http://www.lsc.k12.in.us/policies/C780.html
Here is some formative/summative evaluation form
Sergiovanni and Starrat (read pages 303-304) outline
some very excellent points about problems with summative evaluations of
teachers. Perhaps the strongest is Assumption 2 that "Sporadic, unannounced
classroom visits with no prior conversations and no subsequent discussions are
a legitimate and acceptable way to assess teacher performance." Their rebuttal
is excellent.
|