Moral
Development
What is Morality?
• Morality
refers to a general set of standards about right and wrong and encompasses such
traits as honesty, compassion, and respect for other people’s rights and needs
Social Conventions
• Societies
rules and conventions regarding acceptable and unacceptable behaviors
APPROACHES TO
THE STUDY OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT
Focus on Socialization
• Emphasis
on nurture (vs. nature)
• The
process is universal, as are many of the techniques used to socialize children
• Children’s
increasing conformity to society’s standards for behavior is presumed to be
predominantly quantitative in nature
Focus on Cognition
• Specific
experiences influence the views of morality that children construct, and their
ability to think abstractly about moral dev’t depends
on their cognitive dev’t
• General
sequence presumed to be universal
• Children
and adolescents progress through a series of qualitatively different stages in moral reasoning
Focus on Emotions
• Emotions
have a biological basis, but associating them with moral actions is determined
by experience and learning
• Emotions
associated with moral behavior are universal, but feelings about the various
behaviors differ
• Emotions
(shame, guilt, & empathy) show a quantitative change in the early years, empathy however, also shows a qualitative change
Combining These Focuses
• Developmentalists are combining both cognition and emotion
in their explanations of moral development and behavior
• All
three explanations are useful in some way for explaining moral development
Psychoanalytic Perspective
• Freud
places burden on parents.
– Moral
development complete by 5 to 6
– Superego
• Children
whose parents use threats or physical force
– Show
little guilt after harming others
– Show
poor self-control
Psychoanalytic Perspective, Con’t
• Induction
– Effects
of misbehavior are communicated to the child.
– Encourages
empathy and prosocial behavior
Behaviorism and Social Learning Theory
•
Imitate models
who demonstrate appropriate behavior
•
More likely to
copy prosocial actions of person if:
–
Consistent
between assertions and behavior
–
Warm
–
Competent
–
Powerful
Cognitive-Developmental Perspective
• Children
actively think about social rules.
• React
to violations of moral rules more than social conventions
• Understand
moral rules because they protect people's rights and welfare
• Preschoolers
who are disliked by peers due to aggression show difficulties with moral reasoning.
DEVELOPMENTAL TRENDS IN MORALITY
EARLY CHILDHOOD
•
By 2, act with
alarm to aggression
•
At first morality
is externally controlled
•
Children begin
using internal standards to evaluate behavior at a very early age
•
Later they are
regulated by inner standards
EARLY CHILDHOOD
•
Moral individuals
have principles that they follow in a variety of situations
•
Children
increasingly distinguish between moral transgressions and conventional
transgressions
Early to Middle Childhood
• Emotions
related to moral behavior are beginning to develop
– Children
begin to show guilt as early as 22 months of age
– By
middle elementary school many occasionally feel shame
Early to Middle Childhood
• Children’s
understanding of fairness is evolving
– Preschoolers
judge what is fair on their own needs and desires, early elementary students
base what is fair on strict equality
– As
children get older they begin to take merit and special needs into account
Early to Middle Childhood
•
Learning about
Justice through Sharing
–
Distributive
justice
•
Beliefs about how
to divide resources fairly
•
Damon studied
ideas of distributive justice.
–
5 to 6 years: Equality
–
6 to 7 years: Merit & special needs
–
Around age 8: Benevolence
MIDDLE CHILDHOOD
• Children
increasingly take in to account the circumstances of an event when evaluating
their behavior
Changes in Moral Understanding
•
As ideas of
justice advance, linkage created between moral rules and social conventions.
•
Diverse cultures
use same criteria to distinguish moral and social conventions.
•
Children identify
a domain of personal matters.
–
Fosters concepts
of personal rights and freedom
Punishment
• Justified
when immediate obedience is necessary
– Long
term: Warmth and reasoning better
• Punishment
promotes momentary compliance.
Harsh Punishment
• Provides
model of aggression
• Teaches
to avoid the punishing adult
• Offers
relief to adults, who are then reinforced for using coercive discipline
Alternatives to Harsh Punishment
• Time
out
– Removal
from setting until ready to act appropriately
• Withdrawal
of privileges
• Encourage
and reward good conduct
Alternatives to Harsh Punishment
•
Effectiveness of
punishment is increased when
–
Used consistently
–
In a warm
parent-child relationship
–
Accompanied by an
explanation
KOHLBERG’S THEORY
Level 1: Preconventional Morality
• Stage
1: Punishment-Avoidance and Obedience
• Make
decisions based on what is best for themselves
• Obey
only the rules established by powerful individuals
• “Wrong”
behaviors are only those that are punished
Level 1: Preconventional Morality
• Stage
2: Exchange of Favors
• People
begin to recognize that others also have needs
• May
try to satisfy others’ needs if their own are met
• Continue
to define right and wrong by behaviors that are punished
Level II: Conventional Morality – Stage
• Stage
3: Good Boy/Good Girl
• Decisions
made on what actions will please others (esp. authority figures)
• Concerned
about maintaining interpersonal relationships
• Take
other people’s perspectives and intentions into account when making decisions
Level II: Conventional Morality – Stage
• Stage
4: Law and Order
• Look
to society as a whole for right/wrong guidelines
• Know
the rules necessary for keeping society running smoothly
• Perceive
rules as inflexible
Level III: Postconventional Morality
• Stage
5: Social Contract
• Recognize
rules as an agreement between many people about appropriate behavior
• Rules
are no longer absolute dictates that must be obeyed
Level III: Postconventional Morality
• Stage
6: Universal Ethical Principle
• Adherence
to a few abstract, universal principles that transcend specific norms and rules
for behavior
Factors Influencing Progression
• Postconventional morality cannot occur until an individual
has acquired formal operational thought
• Conventional
and postconventional moral reasoning usually doesn’t
occur until adolescence
• Disequilibrium
helps move an individual
from one stage to another
Research on Kohlberg’s Theory Tells Us…
• His
theory confuses the moral and social-conventional domains
• Most
children are more advanced than he thought
• He
focuses on moral thinking rather than moral behavior
• May
not be as stage-like as Kohlberg believed
Factors Affecting Moral Development
• Use
of Reasons
• Interactions
With Peers
• Models
of Moral and Prosocial Behavior
• Moral
Issues and Dilemmas
• Self-Perceptions
Diversity in Moral Development
• Gender
Differences
– Gilligan
suggests that Kohlberg does not adequately describe female moral development
cultural differences
• Cultural
Differences
– Different
cultural groups have different standards about what constitutes right and wrong
behaviors
Promoting Moral Development
•
Clarify which
behaviors are acceptable and which are not
•
Expose children
to numerous models of moral behavior
•
Engage children
in discussions about social and moral issues
•
Challenge
children’s moral reasoning
•
Expose children
to diverse viewpoints about moral issues
JAMES FOWLER’S THEORY ON FAITH
Stage 1: Intuitive-Projective Faith
• 18-24
months to 7 years
• Children
form powerful, imaginative, often terrifying, and sometimes lasting images of
God, heaven, and hell, drawn from stories
• They
have difficulty distinguishing God’s point of view from their own or their parents’
Stage 2: Mythic-Literal Faith
• Ages
7 – 12 years
• They
tend to take religious stories and symbols literally
• They
can now see God as having a perspective beyond their own
• They
believe God is fair and people get what they deserve
Stage 3: Synthetic-Conventional Faith
• Adolescence
or beyond
• Begin
to form ideologies and
commitments to ideals
• Their
faith is unquestioning and conforms to community standards
• About
50% of adults never move beyond this stage
Stage 4: Individuative-Reflective Faith
• Early
to middle twenties or beyond
• Examine
their faith critically and think about their own beliefs, independent of
external authority and group norms
Stage 5: Conjunctive Faith
• Midlife
or beyond
• Recognize
life’s paradoxes and contradictions, and they often struggle with conflicts
between fulfilling their own needs and sacrificing for others
Stage 6: Universalizing Faith
•
Late life
•
Consumed with a
sense of “participation in a power that unifies and transforms the world”
•
They threaten the
established order, they often become martyrs, and though they love life they do
not cling to it
•
Includes Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther King, and Mother Theresa
Fowler’s Critics Say…
• His
concept of faith is at odds with conventional definitions, which involve
acceptance, not introspection
• They
challenge his emphasis on cognitive knowledge and claim that he underestimates
the maturity of simple, solid, unquestioning faith
Fowler’s Critics Say…
• His
sample was not randomly selected – they may be more representative of above
average intelligence and education
• It
was not representative of nonwestern cultures
• He
may overlook the adaptive value of conventional religious beliefs for many older adults
Real-Life vs. Hypothetical Dilemmas
• Real-Life
Dilemmas frequently differed from hypothetical
• Hypothetical
dilemmas elicited a slightly higher level of moral reasoning than real-life
dilemmas
• This
supports Kohlberg’s claim that standard hypothetical dilemmas are good for capturing an individual's best level of moral reasoning
Real-Life vs. Hypothetical Dilemmas, Con’t
• Gilligan
– She holds that Kohlberg’s theory is biased against women
• No
sex differences were found in stage of moral reasoning development
• The
findings fail to support the notion that Kohlberg’s theory was biased against
female response
Developmental Differences in Guilt
• Guilt
over transgression is the type of situation most frequently mentioned as guilt
producing by students at all grade levels
• Guilt
over situations in which the student is not at fault declines with development
Developmental Differences in Guilt
• Parents
are the individuals who evoke feelings of guilt in the highest percent of
students at all grade levels
• Students
are increasingly likely to report guilt over lying and inconsiderate behavior
as they get older
Developmental Differences in Guilt
• Guilt
over externalizing behaviors (ex. aggression) declines with development
• Guilt
over internalizing behaviors becomes more prevalent with development
WILLIAM DAMON
The
Moral Development of Children
The Genealogy of Morals
• Nativist
theories à
State that human morality
springs from emotional dispositions that are hardwired in to your species
•
Learning theories à Concentrate on
children’s acquisition of behavioral norms and values through observation,
imitation, and reward
The Genealogy of Morals
• Intellectual
Dev’t theories à Believe
that virtue and vice are a matter of conscious choice
•
This includes theories by Jean Piaget and
Lawrence Kohlberg
Conscience vs. Chocolate
• None
of the three traditional theories is sufficient to explain children’s moral
growth and behavior
•
None of these models is able to answer this
important question: What makes them live up to their ideals or not?
•
Research has shown that ideals can have an increasing influence on conduct as a child matures
Do the Right Thing
•
A person must
adopt those beliefs as a central part of his or her personal identity
•
Most children and
adults will express the belief that It is wrong to
allow others to suffer, but only a few of these people will feel they need to
do something about it
•
A study of moral
exemplars showed that they were no more insightful when it came to moral
reasoning than everyone else’s
Do The Right Thing, Con’t
• How
does an adolescent acquire a moral identity?
– It
is gradually occurring as a result of feedback from others; observations of
actions by others that either inspire or appall; reflection of their own
experience, and cultural influences
Teach Your Children Well
• Parents
are generally the original source of moral guidance
• Authoritative
parenting facilitates children’s moral growth better than the other forms of
parenting
• One
of the most influential things that a parent can do is encourage the right kind of peer relations
Teach Your Children Well
•
The work of Ianni: What make the
difference:
•
Teachers did not
tolerate cheating on exams
•
Parents did not
let children get away with lying
•
Coaches did not
advocate bending the rules to win
•
People of all
ages expected openness from friends
Bibliography
•
Damon,
W. (1999, August). The moral development of children. Scientific American, 72-78.
•
Papalia, D.E., Olds, S.W., & Feldman, R.D. (2001). Human development, eighth
edition. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
•
McDevitt, T.M. & Ormrod, J.E.
(2004). Child development:
Educating and working with children and adolescents. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Pearson Prentice Hall.
•
Walker, L.J., de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S.D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations
in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842-858.
•
Williams,
C. & Bybee, J. (1994). What do children feel guilty about? Developmental and gender differences. Developmental
Psychology, 30 (5), 617-623.