Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
CLSC320
Principles of Immunology
  • Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
  • Program for Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Unit - 11
  • Precipitation Techniques
2
Unit 11 Guidelines
  • Reading assignment:
  • Pages 228 - 252 of textbook
  • Learning objectives:
  • Those listed on page 229 of textbook
  • Key terms:
  • Those listed on pages 229 - 230 of textbook
3
Introduction to Precipitation Techniques
  • Definition:
  • Immunoprecipitation is the formation of insoluble Ag-Ab complexes called Aprecipitins@, when soluble antigen is mixed with it=s specific antibody.
  • Factors that must be considered when performing immunoprecipitation techniques:
  • Urelative concentrations of antigen and antibodies
  • Uhydrogen ion concentration (pH)
  • Uionic strength of solution or reaction media
  • Uantibody affinity and avidity
4
Precipitation Procedures
  • Immunodiffusion techniques:
  • Immunoelectrophoresis techniques:
  • Light Scattering Immunoassay techniques:
  • Usingle immunodiffusion (Oudin)
  • Udouble immunodiffusion (Ouchterlony)
  • Uradial immunodiffusion
  • Uimmunoelectrophoresis (IEP)
  • Uimmunofixation electrophoresis (IFE)
  • Uelectroimmunodiffusion
  • \countercurrent electrophoresis
  • \rocket electrophoresis
  • Uisoelectric focusing
  • Uimmunoturbidimetric methods
  • Uimmunonephelometric methods
5
Definition of Immunodiffusion
  • Definition:
  • Immunodiffusion is the movement of antibody molecules and antigen molecules within a support medium
  • When the two reactants meet insoluble Ag-Ab complexes are formed (precipitins) which are visible and fixed at site of precipitation
  • Antigen
  • Antibody
  • precipitin
6
Double Immunodiffusion - 1
  • Also called Ouchterlony procedure
  • UPattern of Identity
  • Continuous precipitin lines that merge and form an arc indicate antibodies are precipitating identical epitopes
  • antibody
  • antigen 1
  • antigen 2
  • precipitin line
7
Double Immunodiffusion - 2
  • UPattern of Partial Identity
  • fusion of precipitin lines indicate antibodies are precipitating identical epitopes common to both antigens while the spur indicates an additional epitope not common to both
  • antibody
  • antigen 1
  • antigen 2
  • precipitin line
  • precipitin spur
8
Double Immunodiffusion - 3
  • UPattern of Non-Identity
  • fusion of precipitin lines indicate antibodies are precipitating non-identical epitopes of antigens
  • antibody
  • antigen 1
  • antigen 2
  • precipitin line
  • precipitin line
9
Precipitation Techniques - 5
  • Immunodiffusion Techniques
  • Double Immunodiffusion Technique (Ouchterlony):
  • UPractical application:
  • The Alberta Health Dept.  would like to confirm that the chicken chop suey from Wings cafJ is really chicken.
  • chicken chop suey
  • anti-rabbit
  • anti-cat
  • anti-dog
  • anti-chicken
  • precipitin line
  • precipitin line
10
Double Immunodiffusion – Clinical Applications
  • eMixed Connective Tissue Disease
  • an autoimmune disorder in which antibodies react with a variety of tissues and looks like:
  • SLE - nuclear proteins
  • scleroderma - blood vessels & connective
  • polymyositis - muscle
  • eSystemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • an autoimmune disorder in which antibodies react with a variety of tissues
11
Double Immunodiffusion – Technical Errors
  • eAlteration of precipitin lines by:
  • 1.excessive condensation in wells
  • 2.improper filling of wells
  • 3.incubation in tilted position
  • efalse results due to misidentification of wells
  • efalse negative results due to under incubation
  • efalse results due to incorrect interpretation of pattern
  • einvalid controls or standards used
12
Single Radial Immunodiffusion
  • Also called Oudin procedure:
  • One of the reactants is incorporated into the medium and is in fixed position and concentration while the other reactant diffuses through the medium from wells cut into medium.
  • agar with Ab=s to Ag being tested
  • Standards of differing concentrations added to wells a - d
  • a
  • b
  • c
  • d
  • precipitin rings
  • the larger the ring the greater the conc. of Std.
13
Standard Curve for Oudin Test
  • A standard curve can then be developed based on concentration vs ring diameter.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 0
  • b
  • c
  • d
  • a
  • Diameter (mm)
  • Concentration (mg/dL)
  • X
  • X
  • X
  • plot ring size for each concentration
  • join dots to form std curve
14
Calculation of Conc. – Oudin Test - 1
  • Patient samples now can be run using same agar media
  • Patients a through d added to individual wells
  • a
  • b
  • c
  • d
  • The size of each ring is then plotted on std curve to determine concentration of each patient=s antigen
15
Calculation of Conc. – Oudin Test - 2
  • A standard curve can then be used to convert ring size to concentration
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • X
  • X
  • X
  • Diameter (mm)
  • Concentration (mg/dL)
  • let=s say patient c has a ring size of 3 mm
  • patient c has a conc. of 3 mg/dL
  • let=s say patient a=s ring size = 2.5 mm
  • = 2.3 mg/dL
  • let=s say patient b=s ring size = 2 mm
  • = 2.0 mg/dL
  • let=s say patient d=s ring size = .5 mm
  • = 0.5 mg/dL
16
Two Methods of Determining Conc.
  • eEnd-Point Method (Mancini):
  • eKinetic Method (Fahey & McKelvey)
  • 1.antigen allowed to diffuse until completion - about 24 hours
  • 2.the ring diameter is directly proportional to concentration of antigen
  • 3.standard curve used to convert ring diameter to concentration
  • 1.antigen allowed to diffuse for limited time - about 18 hours
  • 2.the ring diameter is proportional to the log  of antigen concentration
  • equivalence point is reached
  • equivalence point is not reached
17
Clinical Applications & Errors
  • Clinical Applications:
  • Identification and quantification of serum proteins:
  • -immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgE, IgD, IgA)
  • -"1-antitrypsin
  • -transferrin
  • -complement components (C3, C5, etc.)
  • Technical errors:
  • incorrect filling of wells
  • specimen contamination
  • wrong media or outdated media
  • incorrect construction of standard curve
  • incorrect incubation time or plate position
  • incorrect measuring of ring size or calculations
18
Electrophoretic Techniques - 1
  • General concept:
  • By applying voltage through a support medium it is possible to separate complex protein mixtures
  • Types of support media used in clinical applications:
  • Upaper
  • Uagarose gel
  • Ucellulose acetate
  • Factors influencing protein molecule migration:
  • Usurface charge on molecule
  • Umolecular weight of molecule
  • Usize of molecule
  • Umedium characteristics
  • Ubuffer characteristics (pH)
  • Utemperature
19
Electrophoretic Procedure
  • Serum, urine, or CSF is applied to support medium and voltage is applied
  • point of application
  • anode (+)
  • cathode (-)
  • a stain is added that reacts with separated proteins to form a visible band of color
  • the strip is then placed in a densitometer which converts each band into a peak based on intensity of color and width of band
20
Densitometer Tracing – Normal Serum
  • anode (+)
  • cathode (-)
  • (
  • $
  • "2
  • "1
  • albumin
21
Densitometer Tracing – Monoclonal Gammopathy
  • anode (+)
  • cathode (-)
  • (
  • $
  • "2
  • "1
  • albumin
  • Waldenstrom=s macroglobulinemia
  • Multiple myeloma
22
Densitometer Tracing – Polyclonal Gammopathy
  • anode (+)
  • cathode (-)
  • (
  • $
  • "2
  • "1
  • albumin
  • chronic infection
  • chronic inflammation
  • chronic liver disease
  • if on CSF it may indicate oligoclonal bands as seen in multiple sclerosis
23
Electrophoretic – Technical Errors
  • UArtifacts from hemolyzed specimens causes increases in:
  • -"2-globulin peak
  • -$-globulin peak
  • Upoor or excessive migration due to:
  • -wrong amount of time allowed for test to run
  • -wrong amount of voltage applied
  • -wrong pH due to bad buffer
  • Uexcessive sample applied will cause:
  • -increased peaks
  • -cross contamination of adjacent peaks
  • Uincreased peak in $-globin area may be due to:
  • -presence of fibrinogen may be mistaken for increased IgA levels
24
OSF – Waldenstrom’s
  • Waldenstrom=s Macroglobulinemia
  • On pages 239 - 241AOne Step Further@ presents a more in- depth discussion of the Waldenstrom=s Macroglobulinemia.
  • This presentation is contained on a separate slide presentation called A One Step Further #10"
  • Cytokines
  • The student may call up the slide program OSF-10 later or click on the arrow below to view slides now.
25
OSF – Multiple Sclerosis
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • On pages 243 - 244AOne Step Further@ presents a more in- depth discussion of Multiple Sclerosis.
  • This presentation is contained on a separate slide presentation called A One Step Further #11"
  • The student may call up the slide program OSF-11 later or click on the arrow below to view slides now.
  • Cytokines
26
Immunoelectrophoresis - Concepts
  • Utypically performed as confirmation when a monoclonal component is detected on protein electrophoresis.
  • Uallows for characterization of monoclonal proteins by identifying:
  • -specific heavy-chain classes
  • -specific light-chain components
  • Ua two-step process that involves:
  • -electrophoretic separation of proteins in serum or urine
  • -immunodiffusion/precipitation of separated proteins with antiserum
27
Immunoelectrophoresis - Procedure
  • Userum or urine placed in antigen wells in a test gel.
  • Utheir proteins are then seperated using protein electrophoretic technique.
  • Uantisera (monospecific reagent antibodies) then placed in trough in gel.
  • Uantisera and protein fraction diffuse towards each other and form precipitin lines when equivalence point is reached.
28
Figure - Immunoelectrophoresis
  • gel plate
  • Ag well
  • antisera trough
  • serum added
  • anode (+)
  • cathode (-)
  • separated proteins
  • separated proteins
29
Immunoelectrophoresis - Precipitin
  • monospecific antisera added
  • -incubation in humid chamber for specific time
  • precipitin lines form
  • -position of precipitin lines compared to control for identification
  • -increased in size of precipitin line indicates abnormal production of antibodies
  • -decreased in size of precipitin line indicates immunodeficiency
30
IFE – General Concepts
  • IFE = Immunofixation Electrophoresis
  • UUsed as an alternative to immunoelectrophoresis
  • UA two step procedure as is IEP.
  • UDiffers from IEP in:
  • \the antisera is directly overlayed onto gel instead of
  •  being put in a trough
  • \more sensitive
  • \shorter incubation time (2 hours compared to overnight)
  • \more expensive and labor-intensive
31
EID & EIA - Concepts
  • EID = Electroimmunodiffusion
  • UCountercurrent electrophoresis
  • \similar to that of double immunodiffusion with the addition of an electric current to aid in seperation of proteins
  • EIA = Electroimmunoassay (Rocket electrophoresis)
  • \depends on the creation of different charges of antibody and antigen at selected pH
  • \as antigen moves through gel several precipitin bands appear forming Arockets@.
32
Isoelectric Focusing
  • General concept:
  • UBy creating a pH gradient within the medium immunoglobulin molecules (amphoteric) will move in an electrophoretic system to a point where their isoelectric point is equal to the pH of medium
  • amphoteric molecule = molecules that can act as either a base or an acid depending on pH of medium in which they are suspended.
  • Clinical application:
  • U identification of oligoclonal bands as in:
  • \multiple sclerosis
  • \viral encephalitis
  • \cerebral infarction
  • \AIDS
33
Light Scattering Immunoassays
  • General concept:
  • Uwhen ag-ab complexes are formed in a solution they form immunoprecipitates which have the ability to scatter a light beam that passes through the solution.
  • Turbidimetric application:
  • U detectors set at 180o angle measures reduction in light
  • Nephelometric application:
  • U detectors set at 90o angle measures increases in light
  • in both techniques standard curves are constructed to convert absorbance to concentration
  • in turbidimetry the absorbance is directly proportionate to concentration so std curve is linear and fewer standards needed
  • in nephelimetry the standard curve is non-linear and requires calibrators
34
End of Precipitation Techniques
  • Press the ESC key to end program
35
One Step Further
  • Waldenstrom=s Macroglobulinemia
  • OSF - 10
  • Pages 239 & 241
  • 7click arrow to return to main program
36
Waldenstrom=s - 2
  • Classification:
  • ea monoclonal gammopathy with malignant lymphoproliferation
  • Monoclonal gammopathies:
  • euncontrolled proliferation of a single clone or line of plasma cells
  • ealso called Aplasma cell dyscrasia@
  • eplasma cell clone produces a homogenous monoclonal protein (M-protein)
  • ein the case of Waldenstrom=s the clone produces a homogenous monoclonal protein of IgM class immunoglobulins
37
Waldenstrom=s - 3
  • Mechanism of Disease:
  • ecause unknown
  • egenetic predisposition may play a role
  • emainly seen in older individuals
  • epresents with the following features:
  • ˇmalignant proliferation of B cell line
  • ˇincreased plasma cell population
  • ˇhigh levels of IgM produced
  • ˇweakness, fatigue, nose & gum bleeds, and GI bleeds leads to anemia
  • ˇincreased infections
  • ˇweight loss
  • ˇincreased blood viscosity
  • ˇmay develop neurological and cardiac problems
38
Waldenstrom=s - 4
  • Laboratory Findings:
  • epresence of M-protein on serum electrophoresis
  • eserum & urine characterization of M-protein using:
  • ˇimmunofixation test (IFE) - one of choice
  • ˇimmunoelectrophoresis test (IEP)
  • equantification of serum IgM levels using:
  • ˇnephelometry procedures
  • eM-protein of Waldenstrom=s may be:
  • ˇin serum:
  • wIgM heavy chains
  • weither kappa or lambda light chains
  • ˇin urine:
  • weither kappa or lambda light chains
  • wfree light chains are called   ABence-Jones proteins@
39
Waldenstrom=s - 5
  • Testing Protocol:
  • ˇScreening tests
  • Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP)
  • monoclonal bands present?
  • NO
  • no monoclonal gammopathy present
  • YES
  • Perform confirmatory testing
  • to next slide
40
Waldenstrom=s - 6
  • Testing Protocol:
  • ˇConfirmatory tests
  • Urine and serum specimens
  • CHARACTERIZATION OF MONOCLONAL BAND
  • QUANTIFICATION OF IMMUNOGLOBULINS
  • Serum IFE
  • ID type of heavy chains and light chains
  • Urine IFE
  • Confirm Bence-Jones protein
  • Serum Neph
  • determine conc. of Ig=s
  • Urine Neph
  • determine conc. of light chains
41
Waldenstrom=s - End
  • 7click arrow to return to main program
42
One Step Further
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • OSF - 11
  • Pages 243 & 244
  • 7click arrow to return to main program
43
Multiple Sclerosis - 2
  • Mechanism of Disease:
  • ecause is unknown
  • ebelief is that genetic and environmental factors play a role
  • ˇGenetic factors:
  • these two HLA antigens are present in patient=s with MS
  • ~DRw15
  • ~DQw6
  • ˇEnvironmental factors:
  • ~inflammatory immune response to bacterial and viral infections may trigger autoimmune response seen in MS patients
  • e80% of MS patients have IgG produced in CSF that is directed against basic protein of myelin sheath.  This results in demyelination and formation of lesions called Aplaques@ in white matter of brain and spinal cord
  • edemyelination may cause:
  • visual distrubances
  • lack of locomotor coordination
44
Multiple Sclerosis - 3
  • Laboratory findings:
  • eit is important to determine source of IgG in CSF
  • ˇis it produced in the spinal cord
  • ˇis it produced elsewhere and has crossed the blood- brain barrier
  • etwo assays used to determine origin of IgG in CSF:
  • ˇoligoclonal banding technique:
  • ~protein electrophoresis of CSF shows multiple bands in the ( region
  • ~protein electrophoresis of serum shows multiple bands in the ( region
  • ~if isoelectric focusing used:
  • qCSF shows band pattern in ( region
  • qserum shows no band pattern in ( region
45
Multiple Sclerosis - 4
  • Laboratory Findings: continued
  • etwo assays used to determine origin of IgG in CSF: cont=d
  • ˇCSF IgG index technique:
  • ~this is a calculation that uses the ratio of IgG to albumin in both serum and CSF
  • CSF IgG index =
  • IgGCSF ) albuminCSF
  • IgGserum ) albuminserum
  • ~interpretation of results:
  • q0.0 - 0.77
  • q> 0.77
  • serum IgG in CSF
  • IgG produced in CSF
46
End of Multiple Sclerosis
  • 7click arrow to return to main program