Preface: Instruction
at the higher education level has been fairly entrenched in a "lecture mode."
Today, that
style
is challenged by a paradigm shift which places emphasis on the learner as a processor
of information in contrast to an empty vessel into which the professor may pour
his/her vast knowledge. New definitions of knowledge are emerging as students
and faculty realize that disconnected bits of information are of little value.
However, knowledge that is connected to one's reality may be applied and extended.
These materials support a faculty development program
for colleges and universities. They are most effective used by a facilitator who
understands the principles and is able to model the processes. Effort was made
to give credits where due and permission was granted for all materials directly
copied. Translations in Portuguese and French are available. Permission is granted
to use these
materials
for any non-profit educational purpose.
Comments,
suggestions, and offers to translate into other languages may be addressed to
Shirley Freed, PhD, Professor, School of Education, Andrews University, Berrien
Springs, MI 49104. Email freed@andrews.edu
© 2000 by Shirley Ann Freed
The
Format: These materials are formatted in a unique way!
In higher education we are used to many words and many ideas on one page. This
often encourages only a cursory notice of important issues. We are not in the
habit of pausing long enough to react to the author. I have organized these materials
deliberately so that we will gradually be immersed into new conversations with
new people. Each page is set up to foster dialogue and to resist a mere transmission
of ideas. The first
section in particular on "principles"
has one major idea per page. This will allow you to pause and think about the
meaning of the various statements. It will develop a "contact zone"
between your ideas and experiences and those of others. I will be endeavoring
to engage you in conversations rather than telling you about the conversations.
Most pages are formatted so they can be used as masters for overhead transparencies.
All sections will provide an opportunity for a mixture
of theory, demonstration, practice and feedback (Joyce, Showers) so that your
learning will be more effective. Ultimately, my goals are that each reader/participant
will go away with new knowledge and skills that can be applied in any discipline
in higher education. I will be modeling the kind of instruction I hope you will
come to enjoy just as I have. My journey from traditional teaching to active
teaching has unfolded over the past ten years. Today, I can say with passion that
teaching and learning have never been more satisfying! Welcome to the conversation!
-Shirley
Note: The following files are in PDF format
and landscape to facilitate using as overheads. You need Adobe Acrobat Reader
installed on your computer to read these files.Click on the icon to download
the Acrobat Reader.
Bibliography
Astin, A. (1993). What
matters in college?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Belenky,
M., Clinchy, B., Goldgerger, N. & Tarule, J. (1986). Women's ways of knowing:
The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bonwell,
C. & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom.
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, No. 1. George Washington University.
Bosworth,
K. & Hamilton, S.J (eds.). (1990). Collaborative learning: Underlying process
and effective techniques. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No.59.
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bruffee, K. 1993.
Collaborative learning: Higher educaiton, interdependence and the authority
of knowledge. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.
Cantor,
J. A. (1995). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom
and community. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. Washington, D.C.:
The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
Cooper,
J.L. & Mueck, R. (1990). Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning
and college instruction. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 1 (1):
68-76.
Davis, B.G. (1993). Collaborative learning:
Group work and study teams. in Tools for Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P.
H. (1993). Turning teaching into learning: The role of student responsibility
in the collegiate experience. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8. Washington,
D.C.: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human
Development.
Eble, K, and Noonan, J. (eds.).
(1983). Learning in groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No.
14. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gabelnick, F.,
MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., & Smith, B.L. (1990). Learning communities:
Creating connections among students, faculty, and disciplines. New Directions
for Teaching and Learning, No. 41. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Johnson,
D., Johnson, R. & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the
college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kadel,
S., & J. Keehner. (1994). Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher
education. Volume II. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning,
and Assessment. Pensylvania State University.
Love,
Patrick G., and Love, A. G. (1995). Enhancing student learning: Intellectural,
social, and emotional integration. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.
Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education
and Human Development.
MacGregor, J.
(1990). Collaborative learning: Shared inquiry as a process of reform.
In M. Svinicki (ed.) The changing face of college teaching. New Directions
for Teaching and Learning, No. 42. San Francisco: jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Matthews, R. (1993).
Enriching teaching and learning through learning communities. In Teaching
and learning in the community college. Washington D.C.: The American
Association of Community Colleges.
Michaelson,
L., Firestone-Jones, C., & Watson, W. (1993) Beyond groups
and cooperation: Building high performance learning teams. To Improve
the Academy. Volume 12.
Musil, C. M.
(ed). (1992). Students at the Center: Feminist Assessment.
Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges.
Paulsen,
M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (1995). Taking teaching seriously: Meeting the
challenge of instructional improvement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report
No. 2. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Graduate School of
Education and Human Development.
Smith, B.L.
(1991). Taking structure seriously: The learning community model.
Liberal Education. 77 (2): 42-48.
Smith,
B.L. (1993) Creating learning communities. Liberal Education.
79 (4): 32-39.
Smith, B.L. (1994)
Team teaching methods, in K. Prichard & R. Mclaran Sawyer (eds.), Handbook
of College Teaching. Greenwood Press.
Tinto,
V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures
of student attrition (Second Edition). Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press.
Tinto, V., Goodsell Love, A.
& Russo, P. (1993). Building community. Liberal Education,
79 (4).
Tinto, V., Goodsell Love, A. &
Russo, P. (1994). Building learning communityes for new college students.
The National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
The Pennsylvania State University.
Tinto,
V., Russo, P. & Kadel, S. (1994). Constructing educational communities
in challenging circumstances. Community College Journal. 64 (4):
26-30.
Travis, Jon, E., (1995). Models
for improving college teaching: A faculty resource. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education
Report No. 6. Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, Graduate School
of Education and Human Development.
Washington Center, (1996). Assessment In and Of Collaborative Learning: A Handbook of Strategies. The Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education. Evergreen State College (forthcoming).
Whitman,
Neal A., (1988). Peer teaching: To teach is to learn twice. ASHE-ERIC Higher
Education Report No. 4. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher
Education.
Internet Links